The Rights of Animals: And Man"s Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity

by William Hamilton Drummond

Publisher: J. Mardon

Written in English
Cover of: The Rights of Animals: And Man
Published: Downloads: 888
Share This
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL23451154M

George Eliot once wrote “We are all born in moral stupidity, taking the world as an udder to feed our supreme selves”(Middlemarch). In Fellow Creatures, Harvard philosophy professor Christine Korsgaard challenges this attitude and argues that humans have obligations to other sentient creatures, that is, other creatures who can feel pleasure or pain, and that our sense of human superiority Reviews: ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL By Peter Singer From: ANIMAL RIGHTS AND HUMAN OBLIGATIONS Edited by Tom Regan and Peter Singer. Second edition Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, ISBN # In recent years a number of oppressed groups have campaigned vigorously for equality. Everything on the earth gives us our wealth. We typically treat wealth as solely a matter of money. In fact, money is a human tool exchanged for the real things that make up wealth: edible plants and animals, useful objects such as containers or furniture, the land and .   Human rule over animals does not mean we have the right to mistreat or misuse those animals. Having dominion over the animals should entail a humane management of them as the resource God has ordained them to be. We should consider that mankind was given the task (and blessing) of representing God in this world. We are the caretakers.

If we convince ourselves that animals do not have feeling, feel pain or sorrow, it makes it so much easier to treat them badly and not consider them a vital part of the planet, not to be squandered. Please help stop perpetuating these unfortunate ideas and thoughts, and help your listening audience to have a higher conversation. Roger stooped, picked up a stone, aimed and threw it at Henry-threw it to miss. The stone, that token of preposterous time, bounced five yards to Henry's right and fell in the water. Roger gathered a handful of stones and began to throw them. Yet there was a space round Henry, perhaps six yards in diameter, into which he dare not throw. In the Torah, humanity is given dominion over animals, and has the right to use animals for legitimate needs. Animal flesh can be consumed for food; animal skins can be used for clothing; the Torah itself must be written on parchment, that is, animal hides. A summary of Part X (Section9) in George Orwell's Animal Farm. Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of Animal Farm and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.

The dominion granted by the Creator over the mineral, vegetable, and animal resources of the universe cannot be separated from respect for moral obligations, including those toward generations to come. Animals are entrusted to man's stewardship; he must show them kindness. They may be used to serve the just satisfaction of man's needs.

The Rights of Animals: And Man"s Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity by William Hamilton Drummond Download PDF EPUB FB2

The Rights of Animals: And Man's Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity And Man's Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity by William Hamilton Drummond. Publication date Google Book from the collections of Harvard University Language English. Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Pages: Rights of animals and man's obligation to treat them with humanity () Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen Press, © (OCoLC) Document Type: Book: All Authors / Contributors: William Hamilton Drummond; Rod Preece; Chien-hui Li.

The Rights of Animals and Man's Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity by DRUMMOND, William H.; PREECE, Rod; LI, Chien-Hui (ed.) COVID Update November 3. Buy The Rights of Animals: And Man's Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity from This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations.

Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as Price: $   Buy Rights of Animals and Man's Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity () (Mellen Animal Rights Library S.) by Drummond, William H., Preece, Rod, Li, Chien-Hui (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible : Hardcover.

We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” Kant’s contention was that cruelty to animals leads to cruelty to humans. Thus, it is in the self-interest of humanity to treat animals humanely, at least most of the time.

Kant’s view was that we should refrain from pointless cruelty to animals. We are called to treat them with kindness, not because they have rights or power or some claim to equality, but in a sense because they don't; because they all stand unequal and powerless before us.” ― Matthew Scully, Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to MercyReviews:   Animal rights are the belief that animals have a right to be free of human use and exploitation, but there is a great deal of confusion about what that means.

Animal rights are not about putting animals above humans or giving animals the same rights as humans. Also, animal rights are very different from animal welfare. The case for animal rights. Philosophers have usually avoided arguing that all non-human animals have rights because: the consequences are so limiting for humanity.

The Case for Animal Rights is a book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the "subjects-of-a-life," and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized.

The work is considered an important text within animal rights theory. The Rights of Animals, and Man's Obligation to Treat Them with Humanity (London, ), p.

This is a book originally written for the SPCA's prize for the best essay on " Man's obligation as. Genesis ESV / 44 helpful votes Helpful Not Helpful. Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.

And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and. 'We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals," opined Kant; but you don't need an 18th century German philosopher to tell you that.

hand, writes in Animal Rights. Dale Peterson's aim in his new book The Moral Lives of Animals is to downplay what is unique about human argues that animals' moral systems are. 2) If no to #1, do we have a moral obligation to provide animals which are part of the mass-processed human food chain with a minimum 'standard of living' that.

Mercy is rewarded: "Whoever is merciful even to a sparrow, Allah will be merciful to him on the Day of Judgment." Animals are like humans: “A good deed done to an animal is like a good deed done to a human being, while an act of cruelty to an animal is as bad as cruelty to a human being." Animals cannot speak up for themselves: Muhammad once passed a camel that was so emaciated.

Animal rights is the idea in which some, or all, animals are entitled to the possession of their own existence and that their most basic interests—such as the need to avoid suffering—should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings.

That is, some species of animals have the right to be treated as individuals, with their own desires and needs, rather than as an. Animals have been used as test subjects for medical experiments and other scientific investigations for hundreds of years.

With the rise of the modern animal rights movement in the s and '80s, however, many people began to question the ethics of using living creatures for such tests.

Although animal testing remains commonplace today, public support for such practices has declined. Peter Tatchell is a British human rights campaigner, originally from Australia, best known for his work with LGBT social movements. Tatchell was selected as Labour Party Parliamentary candidate for Bermondsey in Event: Peter Tatchell's keynote address 'Human rights ARE animal rights' takes place at Veggie World London at 2pm on Saturday 8th April, Kensington Town Hall, West London.

The Case for Animal Rights* TOM REGAN I regard myself as an advocate of animal rights — as a part of the animal rights movement. That movement, as I conceive it, is committed to a number of goals, including: • the total abolition of the use of animals in science; • the total dissolution of commercial animal agriculture.

“Animal Rights can be reduced to a ritual avoidance of touching animals; it helps society firmly delimit itself. More than a confrontation with the beast, animal rights is a classification of humanity.

Animal rights may be understood as a social construct which helps to maintain the differential ordering of living objects. Mill rejects the first because an action that benefits the majority may be very small, whereas the benefit to the minority may be very large (e.g., giving coupons to a majority of citizens vs.

giving food and shelter to a minority of homeless); and he rejects the second because an action that creates the greatest amount of happiness may also create a huge amount of misery over those that offer. Animals Have Rights. Animal rights is the belief that animals have an intrinsic value separate from any value they have to humans, and are worthy of moral consideration.

They have the right to be free of oppression, confinement, use and abuse by humans. They have life and hence right to be treated well. From the unbreakable bond between man and pet to heartbreaking scenes of animals at risk, Animals brings depth and humanity to complex situations in a way that only Steve McCurry can achieve.

Across more than pages, McCurry's honest and moving photography speaks for itself. Which of the following best characterizes Cohen's view about animal rights a. Animals do not have rights, and as such we do not have any obligations towards them.

Animals do have rights, nonetheless we do not have any obligations towards them. Animals do not have rights, but they still deserve some moral consideration.

Most cases of animal abuse involve the willful harming of a nonhuman animal. When a man kicks a dog for having an accident in the house or when a woman whips her horse for failing to respond to a command, those are instances of animal abuse.

One of the problems facing animal rights activists is that animal abuse rarely occurs in plain view. These loving, cuddly animals never withhold their desire to offer support and understanding to their fellow human friends, and even if you get mad at them, they will still be there for you.

Dogs are called man’s best friend for a reason, because of their undying. “The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity.

Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality.”. In the daily hubbub of current “crises” facing humanity, we forget about the many generations we hope are yet to come. Not those who will live years from now, but 1, or 10, years. The animal rights movement, by contrast, invariably takes the opposite tack — either reducing us to the level of animals or attempting to raise them up to ours.

Both should be resisted. deny that we are at least obliged to act humanely--that is, to treat them with the decency and concern that we owe, as sensitive human beings, to other sentient creatures.

To treat animals humanely, however, is not to treat them as humans or as the holders of rights. A common objection, which deserves a response, may be paraphrased as follows.quotes have been tagged as animals: Groucho Marx: ‘Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.

Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.’, Charles M.Animals and the law. In the 3rd or 4th century ce, the Roman jurist Hermogenianus wrote, “Hominum causa omne jus constitum” (“All law was established for men’s sake”).Repeating the phrase, P.A.

Fitzgerald’s treatise Salmond on Jurisprudence declared, “The law is made for men and allows no fellowship or bonds of obligation between them and the lower animals.”.